Small Business SEC Regulatory Reform in Washington, D.C. – “All in on Red” on Election Day 2014
“It is important for Commissioners, as well as senior staff based in Washington, to get outside the Beltway. While I’m on the road, I like to speak directly with businesses—and particularly small businesses. That takes some extra effort to arrange, but getting outside the Washington bubble is eye-opening.”
Seems that the bubble is about to burst following Election Day. So like it or not, the time has come for those in Washington to listen with an attentive ear to those outside the Beltway – think outside the partisan box – and act. And then – there is the trickle-down effect. With a change of control in Congress, one may expect those at the SEC – seemingly frozen in place on JOBS Act rulemaking 2 ½ years after the passage of the JOBS Act of 2012 – will see the wisdom of completing their statutory rulemaking duties – and getting ahead of the Congressional steamroller.
At least that is my hope – primarily for Regulation A+ rulemaking – and perhaps even for Title III crowdfunding – where JOBS Act 2.x proposed legislation has been the order of the day in 2014 in the Republican-controlled House Financial Services Committee. Hopefully, with a new Republican Chair in the Senate counterpart to the House Financial Services Committee, the Senate Banking Committee, under the tutelage of Alabama Senator Richard Selby, bi-partisan bills aiding small business capital formation will once again see the light of day on the Senate floor. And Then There is the “L Factor” With President Obama’s presidency in its final two years, one can expect increased attention at The White House on issues which will bolster President Obama’s legacy.
Undoubtedly in a sharply partisan environment, with both parties posturing for the 2016 elections, these will not be new initiatives, but rather improving signature legislation of the Obama Administration – in areas capable of bi-partisan support. Hopefully, with a new Congress, and the White House in its closing years, Congress will be able to come together one more time, as it did with the JOBS Act in 2012, to correct some of its failings, and break new ground for further deregulation of small business capital formation. Expected to be high on the “to-do” list of Congressional JOBS Act fix-its will undoubtedly be Regulation A+. Three areas are likely to get attention:
- Pre-Emption of State Blue Sky Regulation – A critical ingredient to a successful Title IV Regulation A+ is federal pre-emption of state authority to approve or disapprove offerings under Regulation A+. The JOBS Act gave the SEC authority to pre-empt state authority for offerings limited to “Qualified Purchasers,” as defined by the SEC. And though the SEC’s proposed rules made all investors “Qualified Purchasers,” this position has been met with strong resistance by the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), who have gone so far as to suggest that if the SEC’s final rules mimic the proposed rules, litigation challenging the SEC’s authority would ensue. And even the SEC’s rules, as proposed, limit the amount an investor can invest in a Regulation A+ offering to 10% of income or net worth, exclusive of principal residence, even if one is an “Accredited Investor.”
- Exemption from SEC Periodic Reporting Requirements – One of the principal benefits to a company successfully completing a Regulation A+ offering is the attractiveness of having lighter ongoing reporting requirements than a company going public through traditional means. However, what Congress failed to address in Title IV of the JOBS Act, unlike Title III, is that it did not exempt Regulation A+ companies from events which historically would trigger full reporting obligations. Hence, if a company completes a Regulation A+ offering and subsequently has more than 500 non-Accredited shareholders of record, it will immediately lose the benefit of the lighter reporting regimen of Regulation A+. Given that companies cannot control secondary trading in their stock and the number of shareholders, some companies may forego a Regulation A+ offering entirely – fearing that Regulation A+’s promise of less burdensome ongoing reporting may be illusory.
- Raising the Ceiling on Offering Amounts – Title IV imposed a dollar ceiling of $50 million on the amount a company could raise in a 12 month period – and instructed the SEC to periodically revisit this amount, starting in 2014. Many have already called for this ceiling to be raised even higher, from $50 million to $100 million, including SEC Commissioner Gallagher in his September 2014 address.
Title III Crowdfunding may also be expected to benefit from the prospect of further federal legislation, though perhaps not at the same pace, or with the same vigor, as other JOBS Act fixes.
Despite strong bi-partisan support in 2012, support has eroded in some corners as a result of ongoing anti-crowdfunding lobbying. And others, though supportive, may withhold support for further legislation until final SEC rules are issued and there is an opportunity to observe this new market in operation. Ironically, this could result in a “chicken and egg” type stalemate, where the SEC withholds approval of final rules until Congress makes some fixes, but many in Congress have a “wait and see” attitude before adopting new legislation.
So hopefully, when the dust settles on Election Day 2014, there will be only winners, and no losers, at least insofar as small business is concerned.
Samuel S. Guzik has more than 35 years of experience as a corporate and securities attorney and business advisor in private practice in New York and Los Angeles, including as an associate at Willkie Farr and Gallagher, a major New York based international law firm, a partner at the law firm of Ervin, Cohen and Jessup, in Los Angeles, and in the firm he founded in 1993, Guzik & Associates. Mr. Guzik has represented public and privately held companies and entrepreneurs on a broad range of business and financing transactions, both public and private. Mr. Guzik has also successfully represented clients in federal securities litigation and SEC enforcement proceedings. Guzik has represented businesses in a diverse range of industries, including digital media, apparel, health care and numerous high technology based businesses.